巨型期刊
外觀
巨型期刊(英語:mega journal)是一種同行評審的學術開放獲取期刊。它降低了錄用標準,使規模遠超傳統期刊。《PLOS ONE》首創了這一模式。[1][2] 這一「非常賺錢的出版模式」[2]很快被其他出版商效仿。
定義
[編輯]巨型期刊具有以下特點:
- 涵蓋多個學科領域[1][2][3][4][5]
- 只要文章技術上合理就予以發表,不考慮研究重要性[1][2][3][4][5][6]
- 通過版面費支付出版成本[1][3][5](也有非營利性巨型期刊,如《Open Library of Humanities》)
其他不太普遍的特點包括:
巨型期刊只有在線版本,沒有印刷版,完全開放獲取。這與混合開放獲取期刊不同。[7] 一些「掠奪性」開放獲取出版商也採用巨型期刊模式。[1]
影響
[編輯]有人認為,未來學術期刊界可能被少數幾個巨型期刊主導,至少在文章發表總量上如此。[8] 巨型期刊將出版業的資金模式從傳統封閉獲取出版物的訂閱模式轉向版面費模式。[9] 這種商業模式可能無法激勵審稿人。審稿人義務審稿是為了「影響自己的研究領域、接觸最前沿的研究或在簡歷中列出為知名期刊服務的經歷」。[10] 此外,巨型期刊可能不再像傳統學術期刊那樣,充當「特定領域或子領域同行交流的平台」。[11] 為了應對這種不加甄別的做法,巨型期刊的典型代表《PLOS ONE》已開始「將相關文章打包成特定學科的合集」。[12]
巨型期刊列表
[編輯]- PLOS ONE[1][2][3][4][5][6][13][14][15][16][17]
- ACS Omega[18]
- Scientific Reports[2][3][5][6][15][17][19]
- SAGE Open[3][4][5][15][17][19]
- Royal Society Open Science[a]
- BMJ Open[2][3][5][15][17]
- PeerJ[2][4][5][13][14]
- Medicine (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins journal)[21][22][23][24]
- Biology Open[5][6][17]
- IEEE Access[5][25][b]
- FEBS Open Bio[5][6]
- AIP Advances[5][17]
- G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics[5][17]
- Open Library of Humanities[c]
- De Gruyter Open imprint[d]
- Heliyon (Elsevier)[e]
- IET The Journal of Engineering[f]
註釋
[編輯]參考文獻
[編輯]- ^ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Beall, Jeffrey. Five Predatory Mega-Journals: A Review (PDF). The Charleston Advisor. 2013, 14 (4): 20–25. doi:10.5260/chara.14.4.20.
- ^ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Bo-Christer Björk & David Solomon. Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges (PDF) (報告). Wellcome Trust: 69 pages. March 2014. (原始內容 (PDF)存檔於2014-06-02).
- ^ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Wiley. [2014-09-26]. (原始內容存檔於2016-03-04).
- ^ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Claire Creaser. The rise of the mega-journal. School of Business and Economics Research Blog. Loughborough University. 5 May 2014.
- ^ 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 Peter Binfield. Novel Scholarly Journal Concepts. Sönke Bartling; Sascha Friesike (編). Opening Science. 19 January 2014: 155–163. ISBN 978-3-319-00025-1. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_10.
- ^ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 Frank Norman. Megajournals. Trading Knowledge. Frank Norman. 9 July 2012.
- ^ 7.0 7.1 Björk, Bo-Christer. Have the "mega-journals" reached the limits to growth?. PeerJ. 2015-05-26, 3: e981. PMC 4451030
. PMID 26038735. doi:10.7717/peerj.981
.
- ^ Hayahiko Ozono, Okayama University, Participants' Report on The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011. "Burgeoning Open Access MegaJournals". National Institute of Informatics. [1]
- ^ Solomon, David J. A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals. PeerJ. 2014, 2: e365. PMC 4006221
. PMID 24795855. doi:10.7717/peerj.365
.
- ^ Wellen, R. Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs: On the Political Economy of Academic Unbundling. SAGE Open. 2013, 3 (4): 215824401350727. doi:10.1177/2158244013507271
.
- ^ Beall, Jeffrey. The Open-Access Movement is Not Really about Open Access. TripleC. 2013, 11 (2): 589–597. S2CID 142604306. doi:10.31269/triplec.v11i2.525
.
- ^ MacCallum, C. J. Why ONE is More Than 5. PLOS Biology. 2011, 9 (12): e1001235. PMC 3243728
. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001235
.
- ^ 13.0 13.1 Francisco Osorio. Open Library of Humanities: mega journals seeing from the south. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad de Chile. 5 April 2013.
- ^ 14.0 14.1 "Beyond open access for academic publishers", 15 May 2014, Publishing Technology PLC [2]
- ^ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Dagmar Sitek & Roland Bertelmann, "Open Access: A State of the Art", 2 March 2014, Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_9 [3]
- ^ James MacGregor, Kevin Stranack & John Willinsky, "The Public Knowledge Project: Open Source Tools for Open Access to Scholarly Communication", 2 March 2014, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_11 [4]
- ^ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.5 17.6 Rhodri Jackson and Martin Richardson, "Gold open access: the future of the academic journal?", Chapter 9 in Cope and Phillip (2014), p.223-248.
- ^ Michael Bernstein & Katie Cottingham, Ph.D. American Chemical Society announces ACS Omega, a new open access journal serving global and multidisciplinary chemistry. www.acs.org. ACS. 14 December 2015.
- ^ 19.0 19.1 Peter Binfield, "PLoS ONE and the Rise of the Open Access MegaJournal", The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011, National Institute of Informatics, The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011 February 29, 2012 [5] [6]
- ^ About. Royal Society Open Science.
- ^ Open-Access Mega-Journals: A Bibliometric Profile, November 18, 2016
- ^ Transitioning from a Conventional to a 『Mega』 Journal: A Bibliometric Case Study of the Journal Medicine, Publications 2017, 5(2), 7; doi:10.3390/publications5020007 [7]
- ^ Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review [8]
- ^ Pinfield, Stephen. Mega-journals: the future, a stepping stone to it or a leap into the abyss?. Times Higher Education. 2016-10-13. (原始內容存檔於May 23, 2023) (英語).
- ^ Jeffrey Beall. New Term: MOAMJ = Multidisciplinary Open Access Mega Journal. Scholarly Open Access. 3 March 2013. (原始內容存檔於16 July 2014).
- ^ New IEEE Open-Access "Mega Journal" Aims to Boost Technology Innovation New IEEE Open-Access Mega Journal Aims to Boost Technology Innovation. [2014-09-30]. (原始內容存檔於2014-10-06).
- ^ Press Release. Open Library of Humanities. (原始內容存檔於2014-12-24).
- ^ De Gruyter Open converts eight subscription journals to Open Access megajournals. De Gruyter Open. September 29, 2014 [2014-12-24]. (原始內容存檔於2014-12-24).
- ^ O'Leary, Mary Beth. Introducing Heliyon - Elsevier's new broad scope, open access journal. Elsevier Connect. 4 March 2015. (原始內容存檔於Mar 10, 2016).
- ^ The Journal of Engineering. IET Digital Library. (原始內容存檔於Oct 2, 2023).
延伸閱讀
[編輯]- Bill Cope and Angus Phillips, The Future of the Academic Journal, 2nd ed., Chandos Publishing, Jul 1, 2014, 478 pages.
- Peter Binfield, "Open Access MegaJournals -- Have They Changed Everything?", Creative Commons New Zealand Blog
- Sönke Bartling & Sascha Friesike (Editors), Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Web is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing, Springer, 2014, ISBN 978-3-319-00025-1, 339 pp.