跳转到内容

巨型期刊

维基百科，自由的百科全书

巨型期刊（英語：mega journal）是一种同行評審的学术开放获取期刊。它降低了录用标准，使规模远超传统期刊。《PLOS ONE》首创了这一模式。[1][2] 这一“非常赚钱的出版模式”[2]很快被其他出版商效仿。

定义

[编辑]

巨型期刊具有以下特点：

  • 涵盖多个学科领域[1][2][3][4][5]
  • 只要文章技术上合理就予以发表，不考虑研究重要性[1][2][3][4][5][6]
  • 通过版面费支付出版成本[1][3][5]（也有非营利性巨型期刊，如《Open Library of Humanities》）

其他不太普遍的特点包括：

  • 评审和发表流程加速，[2] 周转时间短[6]
  • 采用学术编辑，[6] 甚至建立庞大的学术编辑委员会[5]（而非专业编辑）
  • 提供增值服务，如通过知识共享许可协议提供可重复使用的图表和数据[7]

巨型期刊只有在线版本，没有印刷版，完全开放获取。这与混合开放获取期刊不同。[7] 一些“掠夺性”开放获取出版商也采用巨型期刊模式。[1]

影响

[编辑]

有人认为，未来学术期刊界可能被少数几个巨型期刊主导，至少在文章发表总量上如此。[8] 巨型期刊将出版业的资金模式从传统封闭获取出版物的订阅模式转向版面费模式。[9] 这种商业模式可能无法激励审稿人。审稿人义务审稿是为了“影响自己的研究领域、接触最前沿的研究或在简历中列出为知名期刊服务的经历”。[10] 此外，巨型期刊可能不再像传统学术期刊那样，充当“特定领域或子领域同行交流的平台”。[11] 为了应对这种不加甄别的做法，巨型期刊的典型代表《PLOS ONE》已开始“将相关文章打包成特定学科的合集”。[12]

巨型期刊列表

[编辑]

注释

[编辑]
  1. ^ Self-declared:[20]
  2. ^ Self-declared:[26]
  3. ^ Self-declared:[27]
  4. ^ Self-declared:[28]
  5. ^ Self-declared:[29]
  6. ^ Self-declared:[30]

参考文献

[编辑]
  1. ^ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Beall, Jeffrey. Five Predatory Mega-Journals: A Review (PDF). The Charleston Advisor. 2013, 14 (4): 20–25. doi:10.5260/chara.14.4.20. 
  2. ^ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Bo-Christer Björk & David Solomon. Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges (PDF) (报告). Wellcome Trust: 69 pages. March 2014. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2014-06-02）. 
  3. ^ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Wiley. [2014-09-26]. （原始内容存档于2016-03-04）. 
  4. ^ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Claire Creaser. The rise of the mega-journal. School of Business and Economics Research Blog. Loughborough University. 5 May 2014. 
  5. ^ 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 Peter Binfield. Novel Scholarly Journal Concepts. Sönke Bartling; Sascha Friesike (编). Opening Science. 19 January 2014: 155–163. ISBN 978-3-319-00025-1. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_10. 
  6. ^ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 Frank Norman. Megajournals. Trading Knowledge. Frank Norman. 9 July 2012. 
  7. ^ 7.0 7.1 Björk, Bo-Christer. Have the "mega-journals" reached the limits to growth?. PeerJ. 2015-05-26, 3: e981. PMC 4451030 可免费查阅. PMID 26038735. doi:10.7717/peerj.981 可免费查阅. 
  8. ^ Hayahiko Ozono, Okayama University, Participants' Report on The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011. "Burgeoning Open Access MegaJournals". National Institute of Informatics. [1]
  9. ^ Solomon, David J. A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals. PeerJ. 2014, 2: e365. PMC 4006221 可免费查阅. PMID 24795855. doi:10.7717/peerj.365 可免费查阅. 
  10. ^ Wellen, R. Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs: On the Political Economy of Academic Unbundling. SAGE Open. 2013, 3 (4): 215824401350727. doi:10.1177/2158244013507271 可免费查阅. 
  11. ^ Beall, Jeffrey. The Open-Access Movement is Not Really about Open Access. TripleC. 2013, 11 (2): 589–597. S2CID 142604306. doi:10.31269/triplec.v11i2.525 可免费查阅. 
  12. ^ MacCallum, C. J. Why ONE is More Than 5. PLOS Biology. 2011, 9 (12): e1001235. PMC 3243728 可免费查阅. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001235 可免费查阅. 
  13. ^ 13.0 13.1 Francisco Osorio. Open Library of Humanities: mega journals seeing from the south. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad de Chile. 5 April 2013. 
  14. ^ 14.0 14.1 "Beyond open access for academic publishers", 15 May 2014, Publishing Technology PLC [2]
  15. ^ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 Dagmar Sitek & Roland Bertelmann, "Open Access: A State of the Art", 2 March 2014, Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_9 [3]
  16. ^ James MacGregor, Kevin Stranack & John Willinsky, "The Public Knowledge Project: Open Source Tools for Open Access to Scholarly Communication", 2 March 2014, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_11 [4]
  17. ^ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.5 17.6 Rhodri Jackson and Martin Richardson, "Gold open access: the future of the academic journal?", Chapter 9 in Cope and Phillip (2014), p.223-248.
  18. ^ Michael Bernstein & Katie Cottingham, Ph.D. American Chemical Society announces ACS Omega, a new open access journal serving global and multidisciplinary chemistry. www.acs.org. ACS. 14 December 2015. 
  19. ^ 19.0 19.1 Peter Binfield, "PLoS ONE and the Rise of the Open Access MegaJournal", The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011, National Institute of Informatics, The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011 February 29, 2012 [5] [6]
  20. ^ About. Royal Society Open Science. 
  21. ^ Open-Access Mega-Journals: A Bibliometric Profile, November 18, 2016
  22. ^ Transitioning from a Conventional to a ‘Mega’ Journal: A Bibliometric Case Study of the Journal Medicine, Publications 2017, 5(2), 7; doi:10.3390/publications5020007 [7]
  23. ^ Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review [8]
  24. ^ Pinfield, Stephen. Mega-journals: the future, a stepping stone to it or a leap into the abyss?. Times Higher Education. 2016-10-13. （原始内容存档于May 23, 2023） （英语）. 
  25. ^ Jeffrey Beall. New Term: MOAMJ = Multidisciplinary Open Access Mega Journal. Scholarly Open Access. 3 March 2013. （原始内容存档于16 July 2014）. 
  26. ^ New IEEE Open-Access "Mega Journal" Aims to Boost Technology Innovation New IEEE Open-Access Mega Journal Aims to Boost Technology Innovation. [2014-09-30]. （原始内容存档于2014-10-06）. 
  27. ^ Press Release. Open Library of Humanities. （原始内容存档于2014-12-24）. 
  28. ^ De Gruyter Open converts eight subscription journals to Open Access megajournals. De Gruyter Open. September 29, 2014 [2014-12-24]. （原始内容存档于2014-12-24）. 
  29. ^ O'Leary, Mary Beth. Introducing Heliyon - Elsevier's new broad scope, open access journal. Elsevier Connect. 4 March 2015. （原始内容存档于Mar 10, 2016）. 
  30. ^ The Journal of Engineering. IET Digital Library. （原始内容存档于Oct 2, 2023）. 

延伸阅读

[编辑]
  • Bill Cope and Angus Phillips, The Future of the Academic Journal, 2nd ed., Chandos Publishing, Jul 1, 2014, 478 pages.
  • Peter Binfield, "Open Access MegaJournals -- Have They Changed Everything?", Creative Commons New Zealand Blog
  • Sönke Bartling & Sascha Friesike (Editors), Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Web is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing, Springer, 2014, ISBN 978-3-319-00025-1, 339 pp.
检索自“https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=巨型期刊&oldid=87694407”